Thoughts on philanthropy from The Giving Review’s “Conversations” in second half of 2024
An end-of-year collection of interesting and insightful thinking about grantmaking and giving.
An end-of-year collection of interesting and insightful thinking about grantmaking and giving.
In discussion with Charity Reform Initiative associate director Bella DeVaan and Giving Review co-editor Michael E. Hartmann, the editor and journalist talks about donor-advised funds and the challenges of, and prospects for, potential reform of the laws and regulations structuring the nonprofit sector more generally.
In discussion with Charity Reform Initiative associate director Bella DeVaan and Giving Review co-editor Michael E. Hartmann, the editor and journalist talks about his important recent article on “The Left’s Fragile Foundations;” philanthropy and politics in general, including funding of voter-registration projects in particular; and liberal and conservative grantmaking, including in the wake of populism’s ascendance.
And argues for charity reform.
“Reshaping the Conversation: How to Rebuild Public Trust in Philanthropy.”
On September 26, “Reshaping the Conversation: How to Rebuild Public Trust in Philanthropy.”
An end-of-year collection of interesting and insightful thinking about grantmaking and giving.
The heir, author, and researcher talks to Craig Kennedy and Michael E. Hartmann about philanthropy in America, including its “top-heaviness,” what could perhaps be done about it, and whether any charitable reform might be able to attract cross-ideological support.
The heir, author, and researcher talks to Craig Kennedy and Michael E. Hartmann about the “Wealth Defense Industry,” the degree to which philanthropy is used and charity is abused by the wealthy, and what could perhaps be done about it.
Overall, 81% oppose such tax incentivization, according to new survey from Institute for Policy Studies and conducted by Ipsos. Ninety percent of conservatives oppose it; 80% of liberals do.
Populist wave of resentment not likely to be turned back by an abstruse discussion of the finer points of tax law.